AsianLII [Home] [Databases] [WorldLII] [Search] [Feedback]

APEC Agreements and Declarations

You are here:  AsianLII >> Databases >> APEC Agreements and Declarations >> APEC RULES OF ORIGIN - GENERAL FRAMEWORK

[Database Search] [Name Search] [Noteup] [Help]


APEC RULES OF ORIGIN - GENERAL FRAMEWORK


FOREWORD

This compendium is the result of an initiative by the APEC Sub-Committee on Customs Procedures to develop a guide on Rules of Origin within APEC. The emphasis has been on creating a compendium suitable for use within the business community, to better inform importers and exporters of current Rules of Origin trading arrangements.

This compendium has been jointly prepared by Australia and Japan, while APEC member economies themselves have contributed the content for their respective rules. Their input is greatly appreciated in creating what is hoped will be a valuable tool for businesses and other interested parties within the APEC community.

Every attempt has been made to provide readers with topical and accurate information. However, this publication is not designed to serve as a substitute for the relevant statutory provisions. Readers should therefore refer also to the relevant economies' legislative provisions, which may change at any time.

It should be noted that some APEC economies have advised that they do not have either preferential or non-preferential Rules of Origin and therefore they will not be specifically referred to in the body of the compendium.

ASIA-PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION COMPENDIUM ON RULES OF ORIGIN


CONTENTS

  1. GENERAL FRAMEWORK

    1.1 List Of APEC Members

    1.2 Introduction To Rules Of Origin

    1.3 Preferential Trade Initiatives Of APEC Members

    1.4 Summary of Non-Preferential Rules of Origin

  2. APEC ECONOMIES' RULES OF ORIGIN

    2.1 AUSTRALIA

    2.2 BRUNEI DARUSSALAM

    2.3 CANADA

    2.4 CHILE

    2.5 PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

    2.6 HONG KONG

    2.7 JAPAN

    2.8 REPUBLIC OF KOREA

    2.9 MALAYSIA

    2.10 NEW ZEALAND

    2.11 PAPUA NEW GUINEA

    2.12 THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

    2.13 SINGAPORE

    2.14 CHINESE TAIPEI

    2.15 THAILAND

    2.16 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

  3. APPENDICES

  4. GLOSSARY

 

1.1 LIST OF APEC MEMBERS

† Economy has no preferential ROO
‡ Economy has no non-preferential ROO


1.2 INTRODUCTION TO RULES OF ORIGIN

Rules of Origin

Rules of origin (ROO) are the basis on which the country of origin of goods is determined for international trade purposes. They are used to determine the country in which goods have been produced or manufactured in cases where the production or manufacture took place in more than one country. These rules are necessary to ensure that provisions applying selectively on the basis of origin are not avoided by minimal processing, trade diversion and similar circumvention methods.

There are two types of ROO:

Non-preferential Rules of Origin

Non-preferential rules of origin are important for a number of reasons, including the application of

tariffs, quotas, dumping and marketing of goods. Preferential rules of origin

Preferential rules of origin are used to determine goods which may enter a country under preferential

treatment. That is, they are used to establish whether the goods are eligible for special treatment under

a trading arrangement between two or more economies. Preferential (or reduced) rates of duty are applied to goods which are found to be the products or manufacture of a country defined as a preference country. The principal objective of preferential rules of origin is to ensure that benefits are restricted to those goods which originate and are traded within the particular preference area.

Substantial Transformation

Annex D1 of the International Kyoto Convention provided the international basis for signatories to determine the origin of goods produced in more than one country. Without being definitive about the process, it indicated that the origin of goods should be determined by the last/final country in which "substantial transformation" of the goods took place. It indicated that "substantial transformation" could be determined by applying one of three different methods:

Within APEC, some economies use the "value-added" method, others use the "change in tariff heading" method, and some use a combination, as a means of determining substantial transformation and thereby the origin of products.

Value-added

Under this method, a minimum percentage of the value of a good must have been added within the country or preferential area for which origin is being claimed. There are a range of minimum percentages applied under different trade agreements described in this compendium. There may also be other requirements which need to be satisfied.

Change in Tariff Heading

Under this method, "substantial transformation" is said to have occurred if a good is classified to a different tariff heading than that of its component materials after production

In some specific instances, change of tariff heading alone will not necessarily confer origin. In such instances, supplementary criteria must be used to determine whether the change in tariff heading confers origin.

Specified Process of Manufacture

Under this method, the origin is based on the country in which a specified manufacturing or processing operation for a specific product is undertaken.

Generalised System of Preferences

The Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) is a system subscribed to by many countries, which gives preferential treatment to developing countries on certain types of goods. The GSP will not be discussed in this compendium, but a comprehensive account of it may be found in the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) volume entitled Digest of Rules of Origin: Generalized System of Preferences. In this compendium, some APEC members have chosen to list GSP-based preferential tariff treatments among their trade initiatives. However, this should not be taken as a comprehensive list of APEC members which subscribe to the GSP. For information on which countries subscribe to the GSP, please refer to the above-mentioned volume.

1.3 PREFERENTIAL TRADE INITIATIVES OF APEC MEMBERS


Economy
Trade initiatives
Other economies involved
Method used
Australia
ANZCERTA CANATA

PATCRA SPARTECA Developing Country Preferential Rates
New Zealand
Canada

Papua New Guinea
All Forum Island Countries
Value-added - 50% Value-added - 25% or 75%
Value-added - 50% Value-added - 50% Value-added - 50%
Canada
NAFTA CANATA
New Zealand Trade Agreement CARIBCAN (under GSP)
British Preferential Tariff
Treatment
Least Developed Developing Country Rates (under GSP)
USA Mexico Australia

New Zealand



CTH & Value-added* Value-added - 50% Value-added - 50% Value-added - 50% Value-added - 50% Value-added - 50%
Chile
LAIA/ALADI
Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Chile, Ecuador, Paraguay, Mexico, Peru, Uruguay, Venezuela
CTH & Value-added
- 50% **
Korea
Bangkok Agreement under ESCAP

TNDC
India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, etc (5 members) †

Israel, Romania, Uruguay, etc
(13 members) †
CTH

CTH
Malaysia
CEPT

Malaysia Australia Trade
Agreement
Malaysia New Zealand
Trade Agreement
ASEAN members - Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand

Australia

New Zealand
Value-added - 40%

Value-added - 25% Value-added - 25%


1.3 PREFERENTIAL TRADE INITIATIVES OF APEC MEMBERS (Cont.)


Economy
Trade initiatives
Other economies involved
Method used
New
Zealand
ANZCERTA
New Zealand Canada Trade and Economic Agreement SPARTECA

New Zealand Malaysian
Trade Agreement
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands Less and Least
Developed Countries
(under GSP)
Australia
Canada

All Forum Island countries

Malaysia

As described

Value-added - 50% Value-added - 50%

Value-added - 50% or
45%
Value-added - 50% Value-added - 50%

Value-added - 50%
Papua New
Guinea
Trade Agreement among the Melanesian Spearhead Countries
Vanuatu, Solomon Islands, Fiji
CTH
Singapore
CEPT
ASEAN members - Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand
Value-added - 40%
Thailand
GSTP CEPT

ASEAN members - Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand
Value-added - 50% or
60%
Value-added - 40%
United States of America
ATPA

APTA
CBI
GSP
NAFTA

FAS

Insular Possessions of the
United States
IFTA
Products of the West Bank, Gaza Strip or a Qualifying Industrial Zone
Bolivia, Ecuador, Colombia, Peru

Canada
Caribbean Basin
Canada
Mexico
Marshall Islands Federated States of Micronesia Republic of Palau

Israel
As described
Value-added - 35%

CTH & Value-added
Value-added - 35%
Value-added - 35%
CTH & Value-added

Value-added - 35%

Value-added - 30/50%

Value-added - 35%
Value-added - 35%

† Details not provided
* Both methods used - for details see Canada's appendix on NAFTA rules
** Primary criterion used is change in tariff heading

1.4 SUMMARY OF NON-PREFERENTIAL RULES OF ORIGIN

The following are summary tables of the non-preferential rules of origin for each APEC member.

Abbreviations

In the summary tables, the following abbreviations are used:

AD Anti-dumping duties
CD Countervailing duties
CO Certificate of origin
EO Export control
GP Government procurement
IC Import control
IQ Import quota
MFN Most-favoured nation
MO Marking of origin
QR Quantitative restriction
TQ Tariff quota
TS Trade statistics


Member: Australia
Purposes For imports AD, CD, MK, TS
Legislation Customs Act 1901, Section 4 and Section 153Q
Available documents  
Authorities:  
for legislation
for implementation
Customs Service
Customs Service
Determination of origin Importers’ declaration Customs' confirmation Commercial invoices and other documents
Other conditions or requirements Nil
Review procedures Affected parties may appeal to the Federal Court for review of a decision.

Member: Canada
Purposes For imports MFN rates, AD, CD, IQ, MK, TS, GP
Legislation
Customs Act: Section 35.01, 35.1
Customs Tariff: Sections 13, 23, 46, 59-61, 63.1, 64
Customs Regulations
Available documents  
Authorities:  
for legislation
for implementation
Revenue Canada, etc.
Revenue Canada, etc.
Determination of origin Importers’ declaration, Documentary evidence
Other conditions or requirements (Marking rules for a good from a NAFTA member are subject to other conditions or requirements.)
Review procedures Affected parties may appeal an origin decision with regard to tariff preference.

 

Member: People’s Republic of China
Purposes For imports MFN rates, TS, MK, IC, (AD, CD, SG, TQ) For exports EC, TS, MK
Legislation
Provisional Regulations of the Customs of People's
Republic of China on Origin of Import Goods,
Rules of the People's Republic of China on the Place of Export
Goods
Available documents  
Authorities:  
for legislation
for implementation
Customs General Administration (CGA), State Council for Customs
Determination of origin
Importers’ declaration, Customs' confirmation
Certificates of origin and other documents
Other conditions or requirements Nil
Review procedures  

Member: Hong Kong
Purposes
For imports MK
For exports MK, TS, CO
Legislation
Trade Description Ordinance, Export Regulations of the Import
and Export Ordinance, Protection of Non-Government Certificates of Origin Ordinance
Available documents "Trade Circulars"
Authorities:  
for legislation
for implementation
Trade Department, Certification Coordination Committee
Customs
Determination of origin
Importers’ declaration
Documentary evidence
Other conditions or requirements Nil
Review procedures
Affected parties may make a written request to the
Trade Department for reconsideration or clarification.

Member: Japan
Purposes For imports MFN rates, IC, MK, TS For exports CO
Legislation
Article 68-3-4 of the Customs Directive of General Provisions for
Implementing the Customs Law, Import Circular No, 34-10
Available documents Collection of the Laws and Orders Concerning Tariff Affairs, etc.,
Authorities:  
for legislation
for implementation
Ministry of Finance, Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI)
Customs, MITI
Determination of origin
Importers’ declaration Customs' confirmation
Certificate of origin and other documents
Other conditions or requirements Nil
Review procedures Any person may file a protest to Customs and may make an appeal to the Minister of Finance.

Member: Republic of Korea
Purposes For imports MFN rates, AD, CD, SG, MK, QR, TS, GP
Legislation
Article 31-4 of the Foreign Trade Law, Article 63-5 of the
Enforcement Decree of the Foreign Trade Law, Article 3-7-6 of the Foreign Trade Regulation
Available documents Daily Trade, HS Synthetic Manuals
Authorities:  
for legislation
for implementation
Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MTIE)
Customs Service
Determination of origin Importers’ declaration Customs' confirmation Certificate of origin and other documents
Other conditions or requirements Direct shipment, without passing through any other country
Review procedures Administrative review procedures operated by MTIE, procedures by way of Customs Service.

Member: Singapore
Purposes For exports CO
Legislation Part III of the Imports and Exports Regulations 1995
Available documents (available on the Internet)
Authorities:  
for legislation
for implementation
Trade Development Board
Trade Development Board, etc.,
Determination of origin Exporters' application for the issuance of CO Documentary evidence
Other conditions or requirements Not applicable
Review procedures  

Member: Chinese Taipei
Purposes For imports MFN rates, AD, CD, SG, IQ, TQ, MK, TS, GP For exports CO
Legislation
"Rules of Origin on Imported Goods"
"Rules Governing the Issuance of Certificates of Origin"
Available documents Official gazettes, etc.
Authorities:  
for legislation
for implementation
Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Economic Affairs
Customs
Determination of origin
Importers’ declaration Customs' confirmation
Documentary evidence
Other conditions or requirements Nil
Review procedures Any person may file a protest to Customs in accordance with Customs Law or Customs Preventive Law.

Member: The United States
Purposes For imports GP, MFN, MK, IQ (for textiles)
Legislation
Government Procurement - 19 U.S.C.2511 19 C.F.R 177.21
Marking Rules of Origin - 19 U.S.C. 1304 19 C.F.R. 102.0
Most-Favored-Nation Duty Assessment - General Note 3 to Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States ( 19 U.S.C. 1202)
Textiles and Textile Products - 7 U.S.C. 1854 19 U.S.C 3592 19 C.F.R 12.130 19 C.F.R. 102.21
Available documents
United States Code (U.S.C.)
United States Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) United States Customs Service administrative rulings United States federal court decisions
The Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
Authorities:  
for legislation
for implementation
United States Congress
President of the U.S. and U.S. Federal Governmental departments and agencies
Determination of origin
Importers’ declaration Customs' confirmation
Documentary evidence
Other conditions or requirements Nil
Review procedures
Administrative review by the United States Customs Service
Judicial review by the U.S. Court of International Trade
Review through an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit
Review by the U.S. Supreme Court.


AsianLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.asianlii.org/apec/other/agrmt/aroogf332