[Home]
[Databases]
[WorldLII]
[Search]
[Feedback]
APEC Agreements and Declarations |
[Database Search] [Name Search] [Noteup] [Download] [Help]
2006/AMM/002anx1
Agenda Item: IV
Purpose: Consideration
Submitted by: SOM Chair
Forum
Doc. No.: 2006/AMM/R/004
The CSOM meeting on 12-13 November 2006 endorsed the Hanoi Action Plan to implement the Busan Roadmap. The Hanoi Action Plan consist of 5 parts
The Action Plan has one Annex, that is the List of Key Deliverables to Help Implement the Busan Roadmap.
AMM to endorse the Hanoi Action Plan and submit it to AELM for endorsement.
ACTION PLAN
TO IMPLEMENT THE BUSAN ROADMAP TOWARDS
THE BOGOR GOALS
In 1995 the Osaka Action Agenda (OAA) was launched to provide a template for APEC work to achieve these goals. In 2005, APEC Leaders endorsed the Busan Roadmap highlighting important areas that APEC needs to accelerate progress in responding to the world’s changing environment. The Hanoi Action Plan is intended to work out specific actions to help implement the Busan Roadmap.
This Action Plan comprised of five parts. The objectives and principles are described in Part 1 and Part 2. The actions to be implemented are identified in Part 3. Part 4 provides the implementation methods and Part 5 deals with review. A list of key deliverables to implement the Busan Roadmap is attached as an Annex to the Action Plan.I. Objectives
To implement the Busan Roadmap, the Action Plan focuses on the following objectives:- to identify concrete actions in the areas mentioned in the Busan Roadmap in order to ensure meaningful progress towards the Bogor Goals;
- to set timeframes for activities and programs (where possible),
- to specify capacity building measures in line with the overall ECOTECH agenda in order to assist the implementation of the identified actions.
While upholding the General Principles applied to the entire APEC liberalization and facilitation process stipulated under the Osaka Action Agenda 1995, the following 5 principles will be applied in the course of implementing this Action Plan to help further trade and investment liberalization and facilitation in the APEC region:
(i) StrategicActivities taken in the Action Plan will be of strategic, direct and substantive value, that effectively help member economies achieve the APEC vision and the Bogor Goals of free and open trade and investment in the Asia Pacific region.
(ii) Multi-yearThe Action Plan and its activities thereof will be scheduled on a multi-yearly basis to ensure continuity and consistency of different action areas towards the Bogor Goals. Where necessary, the Action Plan will be updated and revised to respond, in a timely and effective manner, to new changes in regional and international trade and investment environment.
(iii) Action-orientedActivities scheduled will be action-oriented to deliver concrete and tangible outcomes. With a view to facilitating this, programs, where appropriate, will be supported with capacity- building initiatives to ensure their effective implementation on the ground.
(iv) RealisticActivities will be designed and implemented in a practical and realistic manner, taking into account specific circumstances and diverse needs of member economies. Cooperation with the private sector is also encouraged in this regard.
(v) Time-boundEach activity or program will be given an indicative timeframe, where possible, to track the implementation progress towards the Bogor Goals in line with the differentiated timelines for developed and developing economies.
1. Support for the Multilateral Trading System
APEC represents roughly 50 percent of world trade and almost 60 percent of global GDP. It has consistently helped push forward the WTO negotiations. APEC, for instance, was a significant force in bringing the Uruguay Round negotiations to a conclusion, and has played a similarly positive role in advancing the Doha Round. Examples include: the APEC Ministerial Meetings and Leaders’ Declaration in October 2003 which re-energised the Doha Round following the setback at Cancun; the strong 2004 Ministers Responsible for Trade statement in the lead-up to the July package, including an agreement that trade facilitation be launched as a negotiating item in the Doha Round; the 2004 APEC Ministerial Joint Statement identifying three new information technology products to forward to the WTO for consideration and possible tariff elimination in the context of a balanced outcome of negotiations; the 2005 inter-sessional Ministerial Statement on Services; the breakthrough agreement of APEC Ministers Responsible for Trade in June 2005 endorsing a Swiss formula for tariff reductions on non-agricultural goods; the November 2005 APEC Economic Leaders Statement on Doha Development Agenda (DDA), a strong political statement that urged, among other things, breaking the impasse on agricultural negotiations; and the June 2006 Statement on Doha Development Agenda by the Ministers Responsible for Trade, which emphasized that a strong result in agriculture and non-agriculture market access, among others, is a prerequisite for successful conclusion of the DDA and that committed the APEC economies to summon the political will to conclude the negotiations with an ambitious and balanced outcome.APEC’s impressive record in dealing with trade facilitation issues and tackling non-border barriers to trade and investment beyond the formal WTO agenda has resulted in elevating some of these issues into the global trade negotiations agenda. It has also fostered ideas and programs for the WTO such as the Information Technology Agreement.
APEC therefore remains firmly committed to restarting the multilateral trade negotiations and achieving a breakthrough to bring the negotiations to a successful conclusion which is so important for growth and development. The successful conclusion of the Doha Round would also help to achieve the Bogor Goals.Schedule of Activities
Elements |
On-going
Actions |
Future
Actions |
Timeframe
|
Capacity-Building
|
Use the
APEC Geneva Caucus to transmit APEC’s work to WTO. |
|
|
2006-2010 |
Seminars in Geneva |
APEC WTO
Capacity Building WG |
|
|
2007-2010 |
|
Works of
CTI Sub Committees |
|
|
|
|
2. Strengthen Collective and Individual Actions
The Individual Action Plans (IAPs) updated annually by each APEC member economy help realize the goal of free and open trade and investment in the APEC region by 2010 and 2020. In line with the concept of concerted unilateral liberalization, APEC member economies undertake these actions on a voluntary and non-binding basis. Collective Action Plans (CAPs) detail the collective actions of all APEC member economies in the 15 issue areas outlined in the Osaka Action Agenda. CAPs are used by APEC to outline actions and objectives to meet the free trade and investment goals, as well as to monitor and report on progress.Through IAPs & CAPs, APEC has achieved great success in trade and investment liberalization and facilitation. According to the Mid-term Stock-take of Progress towards the Bogor Goals, average applied tariffs of APEC economies have been reduced significantly since APEC’s inception, from 16.9 per cent in 1989 to 5.5 per cent in 2004. A range of non-tariff barriers including quotas, import and export levies and licensing and export subsidies have also been removed or converted into tariffs within the Asia-Pacific region.
APEC members recognized that IAPs and CAPs will remain APEC’s unique contribution to promote free and open trade and investment in the Asia-Pacific region. APEC members agreed that the IAP Peer Review process needs to be more robust, forward-looking and policy relevant to provide better guidance to members on how to achieve the Bogor Goals. The next round of peer review, starting in 2007 will provide an important opportunity for assessing each member’s progress and commitments in trade and investment liberalization and facilitation. The results of the Peer Review should be utilized for refining the IAP templates in line with the changing environment. Effective reviews under this strengthened framework will enable APEC members to undertake an assessment of progress towards the Bogor Goals by 2010 for developed economies and 2020 for developing economies.With a view to better contributing to the achievement of the Bogor Goals, CAPs need to be strengthened through adoption and effective implementation of new CAPs. An annual CAP mechanism should therefore be set up with a view to providing inputs for developing new CAPs. In this connection, sub-fora are encouraged to develop criteria to indicate progress for each CAP in the OAA. Member economies, especially developing ones, should also take into account their implementation capability as well as the APEC’s changing priorities.
With regard to IAP and CAP mechanisms, emphasis should be laid down on capacity building. The plan also should be respectful to unique features of member economies.Schedule of Activities
Elements |
Ongoing
Actions |
Future
Actions |
Timeframe |
Capacity-building
Needs |
IAPs |
|
|
Annually |
|
|
|
According
to the existing agreed schedule |
|
|
|
|
2010 for
developed economies 2020 for developing economies |
|
|
|
|
|
2010-2011 |
|
CAPs |
|
|
Annually |
|
3. Promotion of High-Quality RTAs/FTAs
Regional trade
agreements (RTAs) and free-trade agreements (FTAs) have contributed
significantly to economic integration in the
Asia-Pacific region. RTAs/FTAs have
been an important driver of freer flows of goods, services, investment and
people. Their contribution
is likely to increase as existing agreements are
gradually implemented and new ones negotiated. They may also encourage
unilateral
and multilateral liberalization by demonstrating the benefits
available to liberalizing economies.
APEC economies are aware of the need to ensure that RTAs/FTAs do not add to the complexities of the international trading environment, and that they lead to genuine reductions in transaction costs. For this reason APEC has for several years had policy on RTAs/FTAs as one of its highest priorities with the aim of promoting high-quality, comprehensiveness, transparency and broad consistency in RTAs/FTAs as one of its highest priorities. In 2004, for example, APEC Ministers endorsed a set of best practices for RTAs/FTAs and in 2005 a set of model measures for trade facilitation in RTAs/FTAs.
Also in 2005 Ministers agreed that APEC would develop by 2008 comprehensive model measures on as many commonly accepted RTAs/FTAs chapter as possible. Model measures are indicative examples to provide members with useful reference in negotiating RTA/FTA chapter. They are neither mandatory nor exhaustive, but they are a guide, to the kind of provisions that might be included in an FTA, where appropriate. This work will contribute to the pursuit of high quality, transparency, broad consistency and comprehensiveness in RTAs/FTAs.APEC has also undertaken a range of capacity-building activities with the following main objectives: (a) promoting broad consistency in agreements through the adoption of best practices, (b) demonstrating the benefits of high-quality FTAs/RTAs and (c) helping developing economies to participate effectively in FTA negotiations. These capacity-building activities have addressed both technical and policy issues, and many of them have benefited from the participation of business representatives.
APEC will take actions to grasp the opportunities for enhanced regional economic integration and increased economic growth offered by RTAs/FTAs. At the same time it has to stand ready to explore actions aimed at eliminating or reducing any adverse effects that may have been brought about by RTAs/FTAs. The completion of the work for model measures must remain one of its highest priorities. Recognizing that a Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific (FTAAP) may not be viable in the near term, it nevertheless should be actively considered a future goal for realizing regional economic integration and a complement to the ongoing multilateral liberalization efforts and the Bogor Goals. APEC will also continue its active program of policy dialogues, seminars, workshops and other capacity-building initiatives to ensure that member economies are aware of all viable policy options.Schedule of Activities
Elements |
On-going
Actions |
Future
Actions |
Timeframe |
Capacity-Building
|
APEC on-line
FTAs/RTAs database |
|
|
As required |
|
Best Practices
for RTAs/FTAs |
|
|
2009-2010 |
|
Model
measures for RTAs/FTAs |
|
|
|
|
Workshops
and trade policy dialogues |
|
|
As required |
|
4. Busan Business Agenda
The Busan Business Agenda
recognized that APEC economies would make efforts in the areas of trade and
investment facilitation, transparency
and behind-the-border regulations and
administrative procedures to improve substantially the environment for business.
The goal
of the Busan Business Agenda is to reduce unnecessary barriers to
business activity, address behind-the-border administrative burden
and remove
impediments to trade and investment. In carrying out these tasks, APEC will
remain in close dialogue with ABAC and
the business community to ensure the
recognition of their perspectives.
4.1. Trade Facilitation
Trade facilitation simplifies, enhances security and lowers the cost of complying with rules and procedures both for governments and businesses. APEC in recent years has taken the leading role in trade facilitation, aiming at a more favourable business environment in the Asia-Pacific Region. The Shanghai Accord endorsed by APEC Leaders in 2001 has paved the way for the launch of the Trade Facilitation Action Plan (TFAP), which laid down the target of reducing five percent transaction cost by 2006 in Asia Pacific region. The outcomes of the Final Review of TFAP implementation conducted by APEC in 2006 have demonstrated that APEC has met the 2001 Shanghai target. APEC will keep this momentum by heading for the second phase of TFAP (TFAP 2) for a further reduction of five-percent transaction costs by 2010.Schedule of Activities
Elements |
On-going
Actions |
Future
Actions |
Timeframe
|
Capacity-Building
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Trade Facilitation
|
|
Single Window:
|
SOM I 2007
SOM II 2007
MRT 2007
2007-2010
2009
2010
2010
|
|
Automotive Customs issues |
|
|
2006-2007 |
|
Customs Procedures
The simplification and harmonization of customs procedures will expedite the
flow of goods in the region. Given its importance
to trade facilitation, APEC
has attached great attention to streamlining customs activities in APEC region
with a number
of initiatives being implemented in this area, including customs
computerization and modernization, risk management techniques,
express consignment
clearance, advanced classification ruling system etc... APEC remains committed
to continuing its work
for regional enhancement of harmonized, standardized
and simplified customs procedures and a single window for customs with a
view
to better contributing to the goal of trade facilitation.
Element |
On-going
Actions |
Future
Actions |
Timeframe |
Capacity-building
|
Simplification
and Harmonization |
|
|
|
|
Strengthened
Public and Private Partnership |
|
|
|
|
Standards and Conformance
APEC has an ongoing program of work in the standards and conformance area which aims to ensure that such measures do not inhibit, and where possible promote, trade. Current priorities are the alignment of domestic standards with international standards, promotion of good regulatory practices, encouraging mechanisms for international recognition of conformity assessment in regulated and voluntary sectors, promoting cooperation for technical infrastructure development and ensuring transparency of the standards and conformity assessment procedures of members.APEC will continue to promote harmonization, mutual recognition and capacity-building in the standards and conformity assessment area in sectors of commercial interest to member economies. This will include encouraging dialogues between sector regulators to promote a mutual understanding of issues inhibiting trade in the sector and to undertake joint initiatives to reduce barriers to trade. APEC’s Trade Facilitation Action Plan will include activities in the standards area that will contribute to the reduction of costs by 5 percent by 2010.
Schedule of Activities
Elements |
On-going
Actions |
Future
Actions |
Timeframe |
Capacity-building
|
Standard
Alignment and Mutual Recognition |
|
|
2007 |
|
Sectoral
Standardization and Regulations |
|
|
2007-2009 |
|
Business Mobility
Improving mobility for business people among member economies remains integral to APEC’s goal of trade and investment facilitation. APEC seeks to build on its achievements to date in this area by continuing efforts to streamline procedures for short-term entry and temporary residence, in particular through the further enhancement of the APEC Business Travel Card scheme. Taking account of the increased need to improve travel security, APEC members will also continue technical cooperation in areas such as travel document security, including advancing the introduction of biometric e-passports, Advanced Passenger Information (API) systems, and the Regional Movement Alert System (RMAS) for lost, stolen and otherwise invalid passportsSchedule of Activities
Elements |
On-going
Actions |
Future
Actions |
Timeframe |
Capacity-building
|
Reducing
costs to business |
|
|
2007-2008 |
|
Advanced
techniques |
|
|
2007-2010 |
|
E-Commerce
E-commerce has helped accelerate the pace of economic & trade globalization by expanding business opportunities, reducing costs, increasing efficiency and facilitating greater participation of small business in global trade. APEC has made efforts in strengthening the use of e-commerce in the region through various activities and initiatives to assist member economies maximize the opportunities and efficiently meet the challenges of e-commerce. A comprehensive paperless trading environment that enables the electronic transmission of trade-related information across the APEC region is to be established by 2020.Schedule of Activities
Elements |
On-going
Actions |
Future
Actions |
Timeframe |
Capacity-building
|
Strengthening
the regulatory environment for e-commerce |
|
|
2007-2008 |
|
Best practices
in conducting e-commerce |
|
|
2008 |
|
4.2. Private Sector Development
The private sector is an important engine for development and economic progress. Elements in the business environment such as the regulatory burden, legal and financial infrastructure, transparency, etc all have a powerful effect on the success of enterprises of all sizes, especially micro, small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Improving the business environment helps facilitate trade and investment and at the same time is a key strategy for development.APEC Leaders inaugurated a Private Sector Development initiative in 2005 as a means to enhance the quality of business regulation and related administrative procedures in the APEC region. This objective is consistent with other elements of APEC work, including anti-corruption and transparency. The focus of this activity will be a multi-year series of capacity-building activities targeting specific areas of business regulation where APEC economies are collectively underperforming relative to other areas of the world. These activities will benefit greatly from a close association with relevant international organisations, particularly the World Bank, whose Ease of Doing Business indices provide a way to measure improvements in the business regulatory environment over time.
Schedule of Activities
Elements |
On-going
Actions |
Future
Actions |
Timeframe
|
Capacity-Building
|
Ease of
doing business |
|
|
2007-2010 |
|
4.3. Digital Economy and IPR
APEC is one of the world’s most dynamic economic regions. Innovation and creativity have driven increased regional prosperity, and are essential for continuing this upward trend. Trade in counterfeit and pirated goods, and the use of the Internet for these purposes is endemic. It threatens innovation in our region, commercial competitiveness, especially for small businesses, and the health and safety of our citizens.Ministers agreed in Santiago in November 2004 on recognizing the importance of improved protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights and the need to build on the APEC Comprehensive Strategy on Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) in 2005, “including to reduce piracy, trade in counterfeit goods and online piracy, and increase cooperation and capacity building”.
In 2005, Ministers Responsible for Trade endorsed “APEC Anti-Counterfeiting and Piracy Initiative”. The APEC Ministerial Meeting and Leaders welcomed it and endorsed guidelines that call for further work to address IPRs protection and enforcement challenges.Schedule of Activities
Elements |
On-going
Actions |
Future
Actions |
Timeframe
|
Capacity-Building
|
Anti-Counterfeit
and Piracy |
|
|
|
|
IPR Service
Centers |
|
|
2006-2008 |
|
Promoting
trade in Digital Economy |
|
|
|
|
Other
IPR Initiatives |
|
|
2007 –
2008
2007-2008 |
Educational training seminars and other events
|
4.4. Investment
In the Busan Roadmap, APEC members noted that policy attention was increasingly shifting beyond border measures to behind-the-border market conditions in order to cope with a complex and integrated business environment and a changing trade and investment policy landscape. The Busan Business Agenda, more specifically, states that issues like investment facilitation are now important determinants of economic progress. APEC should have a clear-cut, specific and future vision regarding investment as a component of the Hanoi Action Plan, with the goal of promoting trade and investment liberalization and facilitation, in collaboration with ABAC and other business sector representatives. In addition APEC, through its Investment Experts Group (IEG), will develop an expanded work program targeting increased investment liberalization and facilitation as called for in the Busan Business Agenda. While implementing the expanded workplan, IEG should work in close cooperation with ABAC to ensure that the workplan will better respond to the interests of the business community.Schedule of Activities
Elements |
On-going
Actions |
Future
Actions |
Timeframe
|
Capacity-Building
|
Study/ Analysis/ Information sharing |
|
|
2007
2007
2007
2006-2007 |
|
Guidelines/ Frameworks |
|
|
|
|
Investment
Promotion |
|
|
Early 2007
|
|
Collaboration
with ABAC |
|
|
2007
|
|
4.5 Transparency and Anti-Corruption
APEC Leaders meeting in Santiago in 2004 agreed that corruption was one of the most serious threats to good governance and the proper development of economic systems in the APEC region, and globally. Based on the common recognition that fighting corruption is essential to the development of the APEC economies and for the benefit of their people, the APEC Anti-Corruption and Transparency (ACT) Taskforce was established in 2005 to implement the Santiago Commitment to Fight Corruption and Ensure Transparency, and the APEC Anticorruption Course of Action on Fighting Corruption and Ensuring Transparency (COA) endorsed by the Leaders.The ACT tries to help relevant APEC economies to take appropriate and effective actions to combat corruption, encouraging their effort towards the ratification of, or accession to, and implementation of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC).
Schedule of Activities
Elements |
On-going
Actions |
Future
Actions |
Timeframe
|
Capacity-Building
|
Implement
APEC Transparency Standards |
|
|
2006 |
|
Implement
APEC Course of Action on Fighting Corruption and Ensuring Transparency |
|
|
2006 |
|
4.6 Secure Trade
Recognizing the important role of a secured and favourable business environment to economic development and growth, APEC member economies are endeavored to work together to secure trade in the Asia-Pacific. APEC launched the Initiative for Secure Trade in the APEC Region (STAR) in 2003, which aims at facilitating the flow of goods and people with the strengthening measures on air and maritime transport security. There is a need to have closer involvement of business community in the STAR process to ensure that both government and business community share the benefits of the process.Schedule of Activities
Elements |
On-going
Actions |
Future
Actions |
Timeframe
|
Capacity-Building
|
Implement
the APEC Framework for Secure Trade based on the WCO Framework of Standards
to Secure and Facilitate
Global Trade |
|
|
|
|
Initiatives
for promoting Secured Trade and safety |
|
|
|
|
4.7 Structural Reform
Structural reform aims to enhance the efficiency of markets by adapting the rules and organizations, or institutions that guide behavior within the economy. A key goal of structural reform is stronger sustainable economic growth.In 2005, the APEC leaders adopted APEC Work Plan on LAISR towards 2010 (LAISR 2010) to set out a roadmap for addressing structural reform issues within APEC, focusing on five priority areas (regulatory reform, competition policy, public sector management, strengthening economic and legal infrastructure and corporate governance) listed on Leaders’ Agenda to Implement Structural Reform (LAISR).
Under LAISR 2010, the Economic Committee (EC) will undertake policy-oriented work each year up to 2010, cooperating with other APEC fora involved in structural reform activities. An element of this will be EC’s work in 2007 to identify priorities for structural reform in member economies. In 2010, the EC will conduct a stocktake on APEC’s progress on structural reform, including an overview of how the work programs have contributed towards the achievement of the Bogor Goals.Schedule of Activities
Elements |
On-going
Actions |
Future
Actions |
Timeframe
|
Capacity-Building
|
Regulatory
reform |
|
|
2005-2007 |
|
Public
sector governance and Corporate governance |
|
|
2006-2008 |
|
Competition
policy |
|
|
2005-2007 |
|
Strengthening
economic and legal infrastructure |
|
|
2005-2010
|
|
4.8 Pathfinder Initiatives
While intensifying actions in the above core elements set out in the Busan Roadmap, APEC will also encourage member economies to take Pathfinder initiatives in new areas that may contribute to the achievements of the Bogor Goals. APEC will also consider developing a Framework for Evaluating Pathfinders.5. Strengthen Economic and Technical Cooperation (ECOTECH)
In the Busan Roadmap towards the Bogor Goals, APEC Leaders reaffirmed their commitment to advance economic and technical cooperation to promote equitable growth and shared prosperity in the region. They emphasized that economic and technical cooperation is not only important in itself, but is a cross-cutting issue relevant to advance trade and investment liberalization and facilitation.The Leaders stressed the importance of ensuring that all citizens in the region will have the opportunity to share the benefits generated by trade liberalization and economic growth, and agreed to seek ways of confronting challenges and impediments to shared prosperity posed by socio-economic disparities in the region.
ECOTECH activities across all fora will be strengthened, coordinated and prioritized to promote sustainable growth and equitable development while assuring advancement towards free and open trade and investment in the region. Agreed priority areas are as follows:
Schedule of Activities
Elements |
On-going
actions |
Future
Actions |
Time
frame |
Capacity-building
|
Identify
policy criteria as a guideline for the evaluation and ranking of all
ECOTECH related project proposals
ahead of presentation to the Budget
Management Committee (BMC) |
|
|
2006 |
|
Improve
the quality of APEC’s ECOTECH projects through effective implementation
of the Quality Assessment,
Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (AME) |
|
|
Ongoing |
|
Collaboration
with International Financial Institutions (IFIs) |
|
|
2006 |
|
Bridging
the development gap |
|
|
Ongoing |
|
Coordinate
and oversee activities related to sustainable development in working
groups, committees, taskforces
and networks |
|
|
Ongoing |
|
Undertake
outreach to the broader community |
|
|
Ongoing |
|
IV. Implementation
The implementation of activities underlined in
the action plan will be done via the following channels:
(i) Normal track: to update IAPs and CAPs to reflect the elements of the Action Plan for continual implementation and annual IAP reporting; to conduct the IAP Peer Review according to the 3 criteria: robust, inclusive and forward-looking.
(ii) Fast track: to use Pathfinders to speed up implementation of certain elements of this Action Plan, especially those more related to trade and investment liberalization and facilitation; and evaluate them based on the Guidelines for Pathfinders Initiative adopted in 2004.
(iii) Reporting: to mandate APEC fora to report on the implementation’s progress of the Action Plan on an annual basis.
(iv) Collaboration with ABAC: to review the progress of the implementation of this Action Plan and to take further actions if necessary to reach the Bogor Goals in consultation with ABAC and business community in general.
(v) Engagement with IFIs to contribute to implement actions included in this Action Plan that are of their interests.
(vi) Collaboration with APEC Study Centers and other international academia in reviewing the progress towards the Bogor Goals and the implementation of the Action Plan; and to request advice and suggestions from these stakeholders for additional activities and actions.
(vii) Integration of Women in APEC’s process: Member economies will aim to ensure that activities under this Action Plan take full account of APEC’s Framework for the Integration of Women, especially in the areas of IPR, e-commerce, investment and private sector development.
V. Review
The Action Plan may be revised and improved as necessary in keeping with the 2010/2020 targets and the evolving trade and investment policy landscape within and outside APEC.
ANNEX
KEY DELIVERABLES TO HELP IMPLEMENT THE BUSAN ROADMAP
This Annex is intended to highlight key deliverables undertaken by APEC economies towards implementing the Busan Roadmap.
TFAP:Customs Procedures:
RTAs/FTAs:
Digital Economy:
Intellectual Property Rights
PSD:
Investment:
WTO:
SMEs:
Transparency and Anti-corruption:
Structural reform:
Ecotech:
AsianLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.asianlii.org/apec/other/agrmt/haptitbr411